Furthermore, a good arquitect must be a person who can draw, represent his mind on a sketch or a drawing. In my opinion, an arquitect who can't draw by hand but only on a computer is not a good arquitect because the computer can't be as expressive as the hand, the computer fixes thing that aren't yet to be fixed.
Moreover, a good arquitect must be hard working, perseverant and patient because you have to be able to take time to redo again and again a drawing, a plan, a seccion, in order for it to be perfect so that, if the project is constructed, it would be safe and well designed.
Last but not least, to me, an arquitect must have humility, in order to design something for someone and not design something for him and for its own ego, and this is, to my mind, the problem with the "stars arquitects".
Marie,
ResponderBorrarYou are to write 300 words in your next text, which you probably did not know as you joined the class at a later time. besides, you are expected to comment on at least 2 of your classmates' posts. In order to do that, you must add their addresses to your record. Please consider these things before the next activity.
I really liked your text, it shows your views about architecture with honesty.
Pay attention to the following obs.;
To my mind, to be a good arch(qu)itect you must be passionate about ar(qu)CHitecture , its history and itS evolution
… and the cultures that surround(s) him.
…the culture of (its) HIS/HER clients or the people that will live in his creation.
… a sect©ion, in order for it to be perfect so that, if the project is constructed,
……, and this is, to my mind, the problem with (the) ´star(s) arquitects´.
Especially to the spelling of "architecture" and "architect"